Jason thinks he'd better work out a set of scientific principles that describe the known behaviour of energy and matter that predominate at the atomic AND subatomic scales.
Yasher comments: Ah, I wondered what was going on with your profile pic. I was confused with the "-" part.
Jason comments: Ya, I gues it would have made more sense if I wrote the differencial operator to but then I'd have to keep going and I'd just end up messing with the Schrodinger equation for particles per box and I keep screwing it up.
Yasher comments: Wait, particles? I thought Schrodigner's cat was in the box. Now you have me all mixed up!
Jason comments: The cat IS the particles!
Dean comments: Whoa!!what the hell are u guys talking about????can u explain????lol.....
Yasher comments: Schrodinger's 'cat in the box' experiment: This is a hypothetical experiment in which we put a cat inside a box with some equipment which releases poisonous gas on detection of electrons. In this case, after an hour, one would say that he doesn't know whether the cat is dead or alive, and this can be known only by looking inside the box. But according to quantum theory, it is better to say the cat is half dead or half alive, until we check on it. Confused! Actually it is based on the basic assumption of probability and not the fact. Fact comes in picture when we actually see inside the box, till then it's all about probability.
Yasher comments: I copied that from the Internet, by the way. I knew about Schrodinger's Cat because of our Dad, who digs Quantum Mechanics, but the idea was made funny on the sitcom Big Bang Theory.
Yasher comments: Jason, the answer is obviously 42. Stop thinking so much about it. Sometimes the answer just IS.
Jason comments: You think thats confusing? Try using Euler's formula and then you can throw all that out the window!
Yasher comments: Oh don't even get me STARTED on Euler! *wonders if anyone else releases how full of crap we are*
Dean comments: I feel a little less stupid.... thank you!Sitcom's "whoa" don't watch them..but I know my roommate watch's that show,it looks funny..
Jason comments: If by 'crap' you mean unifying fundamental forces through quantum mechanics, then yes.
Yasher comments: LOL And I don't know where Jason's getting this stuff, but I've been laughing my head off for the past half hour at this stuff.
Yasher comments: Oh so I suppose next you're going to say the more precisely the energy of an object is known, lesser is certainty in calculation of its position in time, and vice versa, also applicable for the position and momentum of an object?
Jason comments: Stop laughing! I'm attempting to unify field theory of the electromagnetic, weak and strong interactions! It's very hard! ... woops, spilldid my drink
Jason comments: are there quantum physics in Winnipeg?
Yasher comments: *pissing self laughing*
Jason comments: ...."the more precisely the energy of an object is known, lesser is certainty in calculation of its position in time, and vice versa, also applicable for the position and momentum of an object?" - Well, smarty pants, you didn't even mention anything about gravity there. Try using semisimple groups to exhibit similar properties WITH gravity and THEN we're cooking with neutrinos! Haha, thats a joke btw.
Yasher comments: A neutron walked into a bar and asked, "How much for a drink?" The bartender replied, "For you, no charge."
Jason comments: Ha!
Jason comments: Two atoms were walking across a road when one of them said, "I think I lost an electron!" "Really!" the other replied, "Are you sure?" "Yes, I 'm absolutely positive."
Yasher comments: HA! I had to email this entire conversation to Dad. He'd be proud.
Jason comments: :D
No comments:
Post a Comment